← Back to Football News
LUNA SOCCER NEWS

Lampard Slams VAR After Coventry's Controversial Loss to Everton

6 November 2026 · 3 min read
Lampard Slams VAR After Coventry's Controversial Loss to Everton
Coventry City manager Frank Lampard didn't hold back after his team fell 3-1 to Everton, claiming that VAR failed to live up to its purpose with several controversial decisions against his side. Three key incidents were scrutinized by VAR during the match, including two penalty appeals and a potential handball in the lead-up to Everton's second goal. Despite thorough reviews by officials Timothy Wood and Gary Beswick, referee Stuart Attwell chose not to award any penalties. Coventry managed to take the lead early on, but ultimately succumbed to defeat on Merseyside during Friday Night Football. In an interview with Sky Sports, Lampard lamented, "I hate to sound like a moaner. It’s a football match, and if you win, you can overlook decisions. But when big calls change the game, it’s disheartening. VAR is there for those moments, and it simply didn’t do its job." Let’s break down the contentious moments that have sparked debate among fans and analysts alike. Towards the end of the first half, James Tarkowski went up for a high ball, inadvertently catching Ethan Pinnock with an elbow before seemingly pulling the hair of Caleb Yirenkyi. VAR reviewed the incident but opted not to issue any penalties or cards. While there was no indication from the Premier League Match Centre about whether the hair pull was reviewed, new guidelines state that pulling an opponent's hair with excessive force could warrant a red card, while lesser actions might receive a yellow. Sky Sports pundit Jamie Redknapp weighed in, saying, "Yirenkyi goes up, and Tarkowski grabs his hair, pulling him down. It may not be excessive force, but it’s definitely a foul that affects his ability to jump. It should have been a penalty." Co-commentator Lee Hendrie echoed this sentiment, pointing out that Tarkowski’s actions clearly impacted Yirenkyi’s aerial challenge. "He’s using the hair to gain an advantage, and VAR completely overlooked it." On the other side, Everton's David Moyes acknowledged the controversy, saying, "I’m concerned because we want the right result, but we’ve been on the wrong end of decisions before. That’s football; sometimes they go your way, and sometimes they don’t." In the second half, Taiwo Awoniyi made a promising run into the box, only to be brought down by Vitalii Mykolenko. Referee Attwell waved away the penalty appeal, and VAR ruled the contact occurred outside the box. "That was a clear foul," Lampard insisted. "Awoniyi’s foot was just inside the area, and the contact was enough for a penalty. It’s a poor decision by VAR; they rushed it without giving it a proper look." The game also featured questions about handball in the build-up to Thierno Barry's second goal for Everton. VAR reviewed the situation but found no conclusive evidence of a handball, allowing the goal to stand. In a post-match discussion, it was revealed that VAR official Wood confirmed the on-field decision, citing a lack of evidence for a handball. The decisions have left both teams' supporters and pundits buzzing, with many calling for a reassessment of how VAR is implemented in crucial moments.

Related Stories

57 minutes ago

City's Streak Ends: Forest Claims Stunning Victory Over Man City

1 hour ago

City Stumbles Again: Maresca Reflects on Nottingham Defeat

1 hour ago

Drama Unfolds as Kansas City Advances and Utah Shocks San Diego